On 06/02/2015 04:11 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/26/2015 05:03 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:01 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say
On 05/26/2015 05:03 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/20/2015 10:01 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No
On 05/20/2015 10:01 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory initialization for
heap values and globals of
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory initialization for heap
values and globals of
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory initialization for heap
values and globals of course also should be changed but it is a task for
Hi Jakub!
On 03/30/2015 08:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Can you please start by explaining the asan_emit_stack_protection
changes? What is the problem there, what do you want to achieve etc.?
Is it to support ABI violating stack pointer alignment, or something
different? If so, the compiler
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:16:10PM +0300, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Can you please start by explaining the asan_emit_stack_protection changes?
What is the problem there, what do you want to achieve etc.? Is it to
support ABI violating stack pointer
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:28:53PM +0300, Marat Zakirov wrote:
2015-02-25 Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com
* asan.c (asan_emit_stack_protection): Support for misalign accesses.
(asan_expand_check_ifn): Likewise.
* params.def: New option asan-catch-misaligned.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 09:53:03AM +0300, Marat Zakirov wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-03-12 Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com
* asan.c (asan_emit_stack_protection): Support for misalign accesses.
(asan_expand_check_ifn): Likewise.
* common.opt: New flag
On 03/26/2015 02:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 09:53:03AM +0300, Marat Zakirov wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-03-12 Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com
* asan.c (asan_emit_stack_protection): Support for misalign accesses.
(asan_expand_check_ifn):
On 03/19/2015 09:01 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 03/04/2015 11:07 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Marat Zakirov
m.zaki...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without
proper
alignment. it's useful because some
On 03/04/2015 11:07 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without proper
alignment. it's useful because some programs like linux kernel often cheat
with
On 03/04/2015 11:00 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without
proper alignment. it's useful because some programs like linux kernel
often cheat with alignment which may cause false negatives. This patch
needs additional support
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without
proper alignment. it's useful because some programs like linux kernel
often cheat with alignment which may cause false negatives. This patch
needs additional support for proper work on unaligned accesses in global
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without proper
alignment. it's useful because some programs like linux kernel often cheat
with alignment which may cause false negatives. This patch
16 matches
Mail list logo