> From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:40 PM
>
> OK for mainline, but investigate whether you can better format the
> config/c6x/c6x.c line, for example:
>
> + best_reg
> + = find_rename_reg (this_head, super_class, &unavailable, old_reg,
> true
> 2014-11-26 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com\
>
> * regrename.c (find_best_rename_reg): Rename to ...
> (find_rename_reg): This. Also add a parameter to skip tick check.
> * regrename.h: Likewise.
> * config/c6x/c6x.c (try_rename_operands): Adapt to above renaming.
OK for mai
Hi Eric,
Sorry for the delay, for some reasons despite being a recipient the mail
didn't hit my inbox but only my gcc-patches box.
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
>
> > 2014-11-14 Thomas Preud'homme
> >
> > * r
> It looks at register that respect the constraints of all the instructions in
> the set and tries to pick one in the preferred class for all the
> instructions involved. This is generally useful for any pass that wants to
> do register renaming. However it also contains some logic to only select
>
We are planning to introduce a new optimization in aarch64 backend, similar to
the FP load balancing pass in the LLVM project [1]. This pass would be core
specific and involve doing some register renaming. An RFC version of this patch
should be posted later today. As part of this pass, we want t
