On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on x86_64/i?86 at least. See PR60776.
They seem to require at least -O2 on x86 with that change. Ok to apply?
Hmm,
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 06:22:14PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on x86_64/i?86 at least. See PR60776.
They seem to require at least -O2 on x86 with that change. Ok to apply?
The reason why the
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 06:22:14PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on x86_64/i?86 at least. See PR60776.
They seem to require
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on x86_64/i?86 at least. See PR60776.
They
On 04/08/2014 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 04/08/2014 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at
On 04/08/2014 11:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 04/08/2014 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:21:56AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 04/08/2014 11:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 04/08/2014 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On
Hi,
what about that one?
Tested on x86_64, s390, and s390x.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2014-04-08 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c: Use -mbranch-cost=0 for s390.
* gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c: Likewise.
Revert
2014-04-04 Andreas
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:41:41PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
what about that one?
Tested on x86_64, s390, and s390x.
LGTM, thanks.
2014-04-08 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c: Use -mbranch-cost=0 for s390.
*
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Thus, please commit any of these variants, if you go for
/* { dg-additional-options -mbranch-cost=0 { target s390*-*-* } } */
plus reverting your earlier changes, you can also consider
addition of two new tests that would contain
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/04/14 10:18, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch modifies the builtin-bswap-6/7 testcases in order
to prevent GCC from using math instead of a compare. Only with a
compare the folding in combine actually takes
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
The adjusted testcases now fail on x86_64/i?86 at least. See PR60776.
They seem to require at least -O2 on x86 with that change. Ok to apply?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c
Hi,
the attached patch modifies the builtin-bswap-6/7 testcases in order
to prevent GCC from using math instead of a compare. Only with a
compare the folding in combine actually takes place.
Whether the return value is produce with a compare or not depends
again on the value of branch cost.
On 04/04/14 10:18, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch modifies the builtin-bswap-6/7 testcases in order
to prevent GCC from using math instead of a compare. Only with a
compare the folding in combine actually takes place.
Whether the return value is produce with a compare or not
15 matches
Mail list logo