I am currently bootstrapping and regtesting the following for backport to the 4.8 branch and the testcase for 4.9 to trunk.
Richard. 2015-06-18 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> Backport from mainline 2014-12-04 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/56917 * fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Perform the negation in A's type when transforming ~ (A - 1) or ~ (A + -1) to -A. * g++.dg/other/const4.C: New testcase. Index: gcc/fold-const.c =================================================================== --- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 221345) +++ gcc/fold-const.c (revision 221346) @@ -8324,9 +8324,14 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tre && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1))) || (TREE_CODE (arg0) == PLUS_EXPR && integer_all_onesp (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1))))) - return fold_build1_loc (loc, NEGATE_EXPR, type, - fold_convert_loc (loc, type, - TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0))); + { + /* Perform the negation in ARG0's type and only then convert + to TYPE as to avoid introducing undefined behavior. */ + tree t = fold_build1_loc (loc, NEGATE_EXPR, + TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)), + TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)); + return fold_convert_loc (loc, type, t); + } /* Convert ~(X ^ Y) to ~X ^ Y or X ^ ~Y if ~X or ~Y simplify. */ else if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == BIT_XOR_EXPR && (tem = fold_unary_loc (loc, BIT_NOT_EXPR, type, Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/const4.C =================================================================== *** gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/const4.C (revision 0) --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/const4.C (working copy) *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,10 ---- + // { dg-do compile } + + int lValue; + int main() + { + switch (lValue) + { + case -(int)((2U << (8 * sizeof(int) - 2)) - 1) - 1:; + } + }