Hi,
On 03/01/2013 03:54 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
How about this patch then? As I said, I have code in need of
constants lined up and Edward likely also wants to take advantage of
them in some of his code.
this seems straightforward enough to go in even at this late stage.
Thanks,
Paolo.
On 03/01/2013 05:15 AM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik b...@redhat.com wrote:
Not seeing it.
Say for:
#include iostream
// A class for math constants.
templatetypename _RealType
struct __math_constants
{
// Constant @f$ \pi
How about this patch then? As I said, I have code in need of
constants lined up and Edward likely also wants to take advantage of
them in some of his code.
Index: include/Makefile.am
===
--- include/Makefile.am (revision 196362)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik b...@redhat.com wrote:
Not seeing it.
Say for:
#include iostream
// A class for math constants.
templatetypename _RealType
struct __math_constants
{
// Constant @f$ \pi @f$.
static constexpr _RealType __pie =
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
What other constants to add?
math
Description: Binary data
2013/2/21 Ulrich Drepper drep...@gmail.com:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
1) In this case I miss the corresponding variable definitions, because
On 21/02/13 16:32, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
What other constants to add?
Pi/3
ln(3)
ln(10) (for base conversions)
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
then this should really be
ext/cmath
1) In this case I miss the corresponding variable definitions,
On 02/21/13, Alec Teala.t...@warwick.ac.uk wrote:
On 21/02/13 16:32, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
What other constants
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 17:14 +, Alec Teal wrote:
On 21/02/13 16:32, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
What other
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 17:14 +, Alec Teal wrote:
On 21/02/13 16:32, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
2013/2/21 Benjamin De Kosnik b...@redhat.com:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in math.h in Unix.
then this should really be
ext/cmath
1) In this case I miss
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Daniel Krügler
daniel.krueg...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/21 Benjamin De Kosnik b...@redhat.com:
How about the attached file as a start for ext/math. I used the
constexpr approach (instead of function calls) and replicated the
constants that are available in
13 matches
Mail list logo
