Ping.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if you got a chance to look at this?
Sri
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hello,
I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time
(wedding
and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now.
Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same
section as
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hello,
I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time
(wedding
and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now.
Sri,
Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same
section as the target function when function reorder is on can be bad
?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi Honza,
Could you review this patch when you find
Hello,
I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time (wedding
and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now.
Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same
section as the target function when function reorder is on can be bad
?
C++ ABI
Hi Honza,
Could you review this patch when you find time?
Thanks
Sri
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam
Ping.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com
wrote:
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM,
Ping.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like this patch reviewed
Ping.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when
Stage 1 is active again.
Patch Description:
A C++
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when
Stage 1 is active again.
Patch Description:
A C++ thunk's section name is set to be the same as the original function's
section name for
Hi,
I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when
Stage 1 is active again.
Patch Description:
A C++ thunk's section name is set to be the same as the original function's
section name for which the thunk was created in order to place the two
together. This is done in
11 matches
Mail list logo
