On February 1, 2016 9:26:38 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Browny points for opting out of the loop over all insns in the basic
>> block when count > limit.
>
>Like this?
>Bootstrapped/regtested on
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Browny points for opting out of the loop over all insns in the basic
> block when count > limit.
Like this?
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-02-01 Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on
> {x86_64,i686,ppc64,ppc64le,s390,s390x,aarch64}-linux,
> ok for trunk?
OK.
Browny points for opting out of the loop over all insns in the basic
block when count > limit.
Ciao!
Steven
Hi!
While looking at this PR (which is most likely a reg-stack or RA bug
triggered by the ifcvt noce_convert_multiple_sets additions), I've noticed
that despite the "multiple_sets" in the name it actually attempts to handle
not just multiple sets, but also the single set case, which is already