On 09/13/2017 10:25 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
>
>
> On 09/13/2017 04:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
>>> been moved out of fold-const.c
>>>
>>>
>>> It also
On 09/13/2017 04:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
been moved out of fold-const.c
It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
(A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A *
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
> been moved out of fold-const.c
>
>
> It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
>
> (A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A * (1 / C1 +- 1 / C2)
>
> which
On 09/13/2017 03:22 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> On 09/12/2017 11:43 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
>>> been moved out of fold-const.c
>>>
>>>
>>> It also removes an
On 09/12/2017 11:43 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
been moved out of fold-const.c
It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
(A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A * (1
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
> been moved out of fold-const.c
>
>
> It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
>
> (A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A * (1 / C1 +- 1 / C2)
>
> which
Hi all,
This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
been moved out of fold-const.c
It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
(A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A * (1 / C1 +- 1 / C2)
which was only used in special cases, either with combinations
of flags