Re: [PATCH] Fix ICE with CET and -g (PR target/84146)

l Yukhin >> <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Tsimbalist, Igor V >> <igor.v.tsimbal...@intel.com> >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix ICE with CET and -g (PR target/84146) >> >> Hi! >> >> We ICE on the following test because rest_

RE: [PATCH] Fix ICE with CET and -g (PR target/84146)

or.v.tsimbal...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH] Fix ICE with CET and -g (PR target/84146) > > Hi! > > We ICE on the following test because rest_of_insert_endbranch > separates a setjmp call from the following > NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION > that must always immediately foll

[PATCH] Fix ICE with CET and -g (PR target/84146)

Hi! We ICE on the following test because rest_of_insert_endbranch separates a setjmp call from the following NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION that must always immediately follow the call. No other note or debug insn (which aren't around after var-tracking anyway) needs to follow the call, so the loop