Hi Honza,
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:57:42 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases_1 (bool (*callback)
+ (cgraph_node *, void *),
+ void *data,
+ bool include_overwritable,
+ bool exclude_virtual_thunks)
Instead of adding _1 variant into public API, please
Index: gcc/ipa-pure-const.c
===
--- gcc/ipa-pure-const.c (revision 215888)
+++ gcc/ipa-pure-const.c (working copy)
@@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ analyze_function (struct cgraph_node *fn, bool ipa
{
/* Thunk gets propagated
.
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; hubi...@ucw.cz
Subject: RE: [PING**3] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:43:18 +0100
Ping...
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
+cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases_1 (bool (*callback)
+(cgraph_node *, void *),
+ void *data,
+ bool include_overwritable,
+
Ping...
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; hubi...@ucw.cz
Subject: RE: [PING**2] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:23:41 +0100
Ping again...
Thanks
Ping again...
Thanks.
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
To: hubi...@ucw.cz
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; richard.guent...@gmail.com
Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:40:56 +0200
Ping...
see: https
Ping...
see: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00536.html
Hi Honza,
as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
via a virtual thunk.
I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
draw-backs, so I leave the details
Hi Honza,
as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
via a virtual thunk.
I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
draw-backs, so I leave the details out...
But now I have a new insight, why the obvious fix for this serious
Hi Honza,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:12:10, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc 4.7.x.
The constructor Main::Main() is first inlined and then completely optimized
away in the dce1 pass. But the thunk is still using the
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc 4.7.x.
The constructor Main::Main() is first inlined and
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started
13 matches
Mail list logo
