On 11/28/2017 05:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:02:32PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv/gen.cc.jj 2017-05-22
>>> 10:49:45.0 +0200
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv/gen.cc 2017-11-27
>>>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:02:32PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv/gen.cc.jj 2017-05-22
> > 10:49:45.0 +0200
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv/gen.cc 2017-11-27
> > 11:57:14.889570915 +0100
> > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
On 11/27/2017 03:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, my C FE rvalue folding patch allows folding
> const variable initializers into the uses of those variables in rvalue
> contexts more than before, and so we get warnings about UB in the test,
> because an unprototyped
On 11/27/2017 04:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, my C FE rvalue folding patch allows folding
> const variable initializers into the uses of those variables in rvalue
> contexts more than before, and so we get warnings about UB in the test,
> because an unprototyped
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, my C FE rvalue folding patch allows folding
const variable initializers into the uses of those variables in rvalue
contexts more than before, and so we get warnings about UB in the test,
because an unprototyped function is cast to a function type with ellipsis in
it.