On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > On 7 Mar 2024, at 13:40, FX Coudert wrote:
> >
> >> I think it's an obvious change ...
> >
> > Thanks, pushed.
> >
> > Dimitry, I suggest you post the second patch for review.
>
> Given that the two patches here (for
>
Hi Richard,
> On 7 Mar 2024, at 13:40, FX Coudert wrote:
>
>> I think it's an obvious change ...
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
> Dimitry, I suggest you post the second patch for review.
Given that the two patches here (for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632) were considered obvious
> I think it's an obvious change ...
Thanks, pushed.
Dimitry, I suggest you post the second patch for review.
FX
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Dimitry, folks,
>
> > On 6 Mar 2024, at 23:02, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >
> > On 6 Mar 2024, at 15:57, FX Coudert wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hmm I recall trying it and finding a problem - was there some different
> >>> fix applied
> >>> in the end?
> >>
>
Hi Dimitry, folks,
> On 6 Mar 2024, at 23:02, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar 2024, at 15:57, FX Coudert wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm I recall trying it and finding a problem - was there some different fix
>>> applied
>>> in the end?
>>
>> The bug is still open, I don’t think a patch was applied,
On 6 Mar 2024, at 15:57, FX Coudert wrote:
>
>> Hmm I recall trying it and finding a problem - was there some different fix
>> applied
>> in the end?
>
> The bug is still open, I don’t think a patch was applied, and I don’t find
> any email to the list stating what the problem could be.
The
> Hmm I recall trying it and finding a problem - was there some different fix
> applied
> in the end?
The bug is still open, I don’t think a patch was applied, and I don’t find any
email to the list stating what the problem could be.
FX
> On 6 Mar 2024, at 13:54, Sam James wrote:
>
> FX Coudert writes:
>
>> I would like to patch this patch from September 2023:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/631611.html
>>
>> This bug is now hitting macOS in the latest version of Xcode (it was
>> originally
FX Coudert writes:
> I would like to patch this patch from September 2023:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/631611.html
>
> This bug is now hitting macOS in the latest version of Xcode (it was
> originally seen on freebsd).
> I confirm that the patch is restoring
I would like to patch this patch from September 2023:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/631611.html
This bug is now hitting macOS in the latest version of Xcode (it was originally
seen on freebsd).
I confirm that the patch is restoring bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin23
Sam James writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Sam James writes:
>
>> Sam James writes:
>>
>>> Dimitry Andric writes:
>>>
Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.
>>>
>>> Yes please - we've been using this in Gentoo since around when it was
>>> first posted. No
On 28/09/23 18:37 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
When building gcc's C++ sources against recent libc++, the poisoning of
the ctype macros due to including safe-ctype.h before including C++
standard headers such as , , etc, causes many
Sam James writes:
> Sam James writes:
>
>> Dimitry Andric writes:
>>
>>> Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.
>>>
>>
>> Yes please - we've been using this in Gentoo since around when it was
>> first posted. No complaints.
>>
>> I cannot approve but it looks good to me.
>
> Ping.
Sam James writes:
> Dimitry Andric writes:
>
>> Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.
>>
>
> Yes please - we've been using this in Gentoo since around when it was
> first posted. No complaints.
>
> I cannot approve but it looks good to me.
Ping.
>
>> -Dimitry
>>
>>> On 28 Sep 2023,
Dimitry Andric writes:
> Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.
>
Yes please - we've been using this in Gentoo since around when it was
first posted. No complaints.
I cannot approve but it looks good to me.
> -Dimitry
>
>> On 28 Sep 2023, at 18:37, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> Ref:
Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.
-Dimitry
> On 28 Sep 2023, at 18:37, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
>
> When building gcc's C++ sources against recent libc++, the poisoning of
> the ctype macros due to including safe-ctype.h
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
When building gcc's C++ sources against recent libc++, the poisoning of
the ctype macros due to including safe-ctype.h before including C++
standard headers such as , , etc, causes many compilation
errors, similar to:
In file included
17 matches
Mail list logo
