Re: [PATCH] Prettify output of debug_dwarf_die

[Richard Biener]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 8:35 PM Tom Tromey  wrote:
>
> When debugging gcc, I tried calling debug_dwarf_die and I saw this
> output:
>
>   DW_AT_location: location descriptor:
> (0x7fffe9c2e870) DW_OP_dup 0, 0
> (0x7fffe9c2e8c0) DW_OP_bra location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e640)
> , 0
> (0x7fffe9c2e820) DW_OP_lit4 4, 0
> (0x7fffe9c2e910) DW_OP_skip location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e9b0)
> , 0
> (0x7fffe9c2e640) DW_OP_dup 0, 0
>
> I think those ", 0" should not appear on their own lines.  The issue
> seems to be that print_dw_val should not generally emit a newline,
> except when recursing.

OK.

> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> * dwarf2out.cc (print_dw_val) : Don't
> print newline when not recursing.
> ---
>  gcc/dwarf2out.cc | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> index 8f18bc4fe64..1b0e8b5a5b2 100644
> --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
> @@ -6651,7 +6651,7 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE 
> *outfile)
>  case dw_val_class_loc:
>fprintf (outfile, "location descriptor");
>if (val->v.val_loc == NULL)
> -   fprintf (outfile, " -> \n");
> +   fprintf (outfile, " -> ");
>else if (recurse)
> {
>   fprintf (outfile, ":\n");
> @@ -6662,9 +6662,9 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE 
> *outfile)
>else
> {
>   if (flag_dump_noaddr || flag_dump_unnumbered)
> -   fprintf (outfile, " #\n");
> +   fprintf (outfile, " #");
>   else
> -   fprintf (outfile, " (%p)\n", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
> +   fprintf (outfile, " (%p)", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
> }
>break;
>  case dw_val_class_loc_list:
> --
> 2.43.0
>

[PATCH] Prettify output of debug_dwarf_die

[Tom Tromey]

When debugging gcc, I tried calling debug_dwarf_die and I saw this
output:

  DW_AT_location: location descriptor:
(0x7fffe9c2e870) DW_OP_dup 0, 0
(0x7fffe9c2e8c0) DW_OP_bra location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e640)
, 0
(0x7fffe9c2e820) DW_OP_lit4 4, 0
(0x7fffe9c2e910) DW_OP_skip location descriptor (0x7fffe9c2e9b0)
, 0
(0x7fffe9c2e640) DW_OP_dup 0, 0

I think those ", 0" should not appear on their own lines.  The issue
seems to be that print_dw_val should not generally emit a newline,
except when recursing.

gcc/ChangeLog

* dwarf2out.cc (print_dw_val) : Don't
print newline when not recursing.
---
 gcc/dwarf2out.cc | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index 8f18bc4fe64..1b0e8b5a5b2 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
@@ -6651,7 +6651,7 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE 
*outfile)
 case dw_val_class_loc:
   fprintf (outfile, "location descriptor");
   if (val->v.val_loc == NULL)
-   fprintf (outfile, " -> \n");
+   fprintf (outfile, " -> ");
   else if (recurse)
{
  fprintf (outfile, ":\n");
@@ -6662,9 +6662,9 @@ print_dw_val (dw_val_node *val, bool recurse, FILE 
*outfile)
   else
{
  if (flag_dump_noaddr || flag_dump_unnumbered)
-   fprintf (outfile, " #\n");
+   fprintf (outfile, " #");
  else
-   fprintf (outfile, " (%p)\n", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
+   fprintf (outfile, " (%p)", (void *) val->v.val_loc);
}
   break;
 case dw_val_class_loc_list:
-- 
2.43.0