From: Tsukasa OI
arch-24.c and arch-25.c are exactly the same and redundant. The author
suspects that the original author intended to test two base ISAs (RV32I and
RV64I) so this commit changes arch-24.c to test that RV32I+Zcf does not
cause any errors.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c: Test RV32I+Zcf instead.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c
index 3be4ade65a77..af15c3234b5e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-24.c
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zcf -mabi=lp64" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32i_zcf -mabi=ilp32" } */
int foo() {}
-/* { dg-error "'-march=rv64i_zcf': zcf extension supports in rv32 only" "" {
target *-*-* } 0 } */
-/* { dg-error "'-march=rv64i_zca_zcf': zcf extension supports in rv32 only" ""
{ target *-*-* } 0 } */
base-commit: 818cc9f2d2f3dbbd4004ff85d3125d92d1e430c9
--
2.42.0
