2014-08-22 1:45 GMT+08:00 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 19/08/14 15:24, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Richard:
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. It might not be used at present, but on:
AArch64, with more call-clobbered registers than
-it-no.patch
From 6a99f77eb6785c8d471329bda4bc67885f35909a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kito Cheng k...@0xlab.org
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:10:47 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Remove CALLER_SAVE_PROFITABLE since nobody use it now.
---
gcc/doc/tm.texi| 10 --
gcc/doc/tm.texi.in | 10
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 19/08/14 15:24, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Richard:
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. It might not be used at present, but on:
AArch64, with more call-clobbered registers than call-saved registers, I
would expect this ought to be a win. The fact
] Remove CALLER_SAVE_PROFITABLE since nobody use it now.
---
gcc/doc/tm.texi| 10 --
gcc/doc/tm.texi.in | 10 --
gcc/regs.h | 8
gcc/system.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
/tm.texi: Regenerate.
* gcc/regs.h (CALLER_SAVE_PROFITABLE): Remove.
From c8aeb654e6eaaeb07a1cde9a83a6340a901a4d3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kito Cheng k...@0xlab.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:09:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Remove CALLER_SAVE_PROFITABLE since nobody use it now.
---
gcc/doc
Cheng k...@0xlab.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:09:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Remove CALLER_SAVE_PROFITABLE since nobody use it now.
---
gcc/doc/tm.texi| 10 --
gcc/doc/tm.texi.in | 10 --
gcc/regs.h | 8
3 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. It might not be used at present, but on
AArch64, with more call-clobbered registers than call-saved registers, I
would expect this ought to be a win. The fact that it isn't on today
may say more about the way it