Re: [PATCH] Remove strict-alignment checks in SRA

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:

 Hi,
 
 since we now should be able to expand misaligned MEM_REFs properly and
 both SRA and IPA-SRA now tag the memory accesses with the appropriate
 alignment information, we should now be able to get rid off the SRA
 disabling in the face of potential strict-alignment expansion
 problems.  The patch below does that.
 
 When I applied it before applying the patches fixing misaligned
 expansion, testcases gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c and
 gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr49923.c failed on strict-alignment platforms.
 However, when applied to the current trunk, they pass bootstrap and
 testsuite on sparc64-linux, ia64-linux, x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
 OK for trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

 Thanks,
 
 Martin
 
 
 2012-03-20  Martin Jambor  mjam...@suse.cz
 
   PR tree-optimization/50052
   * tree-sra.c (tree_non_aligned_mem_p): Removed.
   (tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p): Likewise.
   (build_accesses_from_assign): Removed strict alignment requirements
   checks.
   (access_precludes_ipa_sra_p): Likewise.
 
   * testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c: Also run on strict-alignment
   platforms.
 
 
 Index: src/gcc/tree-sra.c
 ===
 --- src.orig/gcc/tree-sra.c
 +++ src/gcc/tree-sra.c
 @@ -1081,53 +1081,6 @@ disqualify_ops_if_throwing_stmt (gimple
return false;
  }
  
 -/* Return true if EXP is a memory reference less aligned than ALIGN.  This is
 -   invoked only on strict-alignment targets.  */
 -
 -static bool
 -tree_non_aligned_mem_p (tree exp, unsigned int align)
 -{
 -  unsigned int exp_align;
 -
 -  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR)
 -exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
 -
 -  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == SSA_NAME || is_gimple_min_invariant (exp))
 -return false;
 -
 -  /* get_object_alignment will fall back to BITS_PER_UNIT if it cannot
 - compute an explicit alignment.  Pretend that dereferenced pointers
 - are always aligned on strict-alignment targets.  */
 -  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == MEM_REF || TREE_CODE (exp) == TARGET_MEM_REF)
 -exp_align = get_object_or_type_alignment (exp);
 -  else
 -exp_align = get_object_alignment (exp);
 -
 -  if (exp_align  align)
 -return true;
 -
 -  return false;
 -}
 -
 -/* Return true if EXP is a memory reference less aligned than what the access
 -   ACC would require.  This is invoked only on strict-alignment targets.  */
 -
 -static bool
 -tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (tree exp, struct access *acc)
 -{
 -  unsigned int acc_align;
 -
 -  /* The alignment of the access is that of its expression.  However, it may
 - have been artificially increased, e.g. by a local alignment promotion,
 - so we cap it to the alignment of the type of the base, on the grounds
 - that valid sub-accesses cannot be more aligned than that.  */
 -  acc_align = get_object_alignment (acc-expr);
 -  if (acc-base  acc_align  TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (acc-base)))
 -acc_align = TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (acc-base));
 -
 -  return tree_non_aligned_mem_p (exp, acc_align);
 -}
 -
  /* Scan expressions occuring in STMT, create access structures for all 
 accesses
 to candidates for scalarization and remove those candidates which occur in
 statements or expressions that prevent them from being split apart.  
 Return
 @@ -1154,11 +1107,7 @@ build_accesses_from_assign (gimple stmt)
lacc = build_access_from_expr_1 (lhs, stmt, true);
  
if (lacc)
 -{
 -  lacc-grp_assignment_write = 1;
 -  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT  tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (rhs, lacc))
 -lacc-grp_unscalarizable_region = 1;
 -}
 +lacc-grp_assignment_write = 1;
  
if (racc)
  {
 @@ -1166,8 +1115,6 @@ build_accesses_from_assign (gimple stmt)
if (should_scalarize_away_bitmap  !gimple_has_volatile_ops (stmt)
  !is_gimple_reg_type (racc-type))
   bitmap_set_bit (should_scalarize_away_bitmap, DECL_UID (racc-base));
 -  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT  tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (lhs, racc))
 -racc-grp_unscalarizable_region = 1;
  }
  
if (lacc  racc
 @@ -3835,10 +3782,6 @@ access_precludes_ipa_sra_p (struct acces
 || gimple_code (access-stmt) == GIMPLE_ASM))
  return true;
  
 -  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT
 -   tree_non_aligned_mem_p (access-expr, TYPE_ALIGN (access-type)))
 -return true;
 -
return false;
  }
  
 Index: src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
 ===
 --- src.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
 +++ src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
 @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  /* { dg-do compile } */
  /* { dg-options -O2 -fipa-sra -fdump-tree-eipa_sra-details  } */
 -/* { dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align } */
  
  struct bovid
  {
 
 

-- 
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer

[PATCH] Remove strict-alignment checks in SRA

2012-03-23 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi,

since we now should be able to expand misaligned MEM_REFs properly and
both SRA and IPA-SRA now tag the memory accesses with the appropriate
alignment information, we should now be able to get rid off the SRA
disabling in the face of potential strict-alignment expansion
problems.  The patch below does that.

When I applied it before applying the patches fixing misaligned
expansion, testcases gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c and
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr49923.c failed on strict-alignment platforms.
However, when applied to the current trunk, they pass bootstrap and
testsuite on sparc64-linux, ia64-linux, x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
OK for trunk?

Thanks,

Martin


2012-03-20  Martin Jambor  mjam...@suse.cz

PR tree-optimization/50052
* tree-sra.c (tree_non_aligned_mem_p): Removed.
(tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p): Likewise.
(build_accesses_from_assign): Removed strict alignment requirements
checks.
(access_precludes_ipa_sra_p): Likewise.

* testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c: Also run on strict-alignment
platforms.


Index: src/gcc/tree-sra.c
===
--- src.orig/gcc/tree-sra.c
+++ src/gcc/tree-sra.c
@@ -1081,53 +1081,6 @@ disqualify_ops_if_throwing_stmt (gimple
   return false;
 }
 
-/* Return true if EXP is a memory reference less aligned than ALIGN.  This is
-   invoked only on strict-alignment targets.  */
-
-static bool
-tree_non_aligned_mem_p (tree exp, unsigned int align)
-{
-  unsigned int exp_align;
-
-  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR)
-exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
-
-  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == SSA_NAME || is_gimple_min_invariant (exp))
-return false;
-
-  /* get_object_alignment will fall back to BITS_PER_UNIT if it cannot
- compute an explicit alignment.  Pretend that dereferenced pointers
- are always aligned on strict-alignment targets.  */
-  if (TREE_CODE (exp) == MEM_REF || TREE_CODE (exp) == TARGET_MEM_REF)
-exp_align = get_object_or_type_alignment (exp);
-  else
-exp_align = get_object_alignment (exp);
-
-  if (exp_align  align)
-return true;
-
-  return false;
-}
-
-/* Return true if EXP is a memory reference less aligned than what the access
-   ACC would require.  This is invoked only on strict-alignment targets.  */
-
-static bool
-tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (tree exp, struct access *acc)
-{
-  unsigned int acc_align;
-
-  /* The alignment of the access is that of its expression.  However, it may
- have been artificially increased, e.g. by a local alignment promotion,
- so we cap it to the alignment of the type of the base, on the grounds
- that valid sub-accesses cannot be more aligned than that.  */
-  acc_align = get_object_alignment (acc-expr);
-  if (acc-base  acc_align  TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (acc-base)))
-acc_align = TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (acc-base));
-
-  return tree_non_aligned_mem_p (exp, acc_align);
-}
-
 /* Scan expressions occuring in STMT, create access structures for all accesses
to candidates for scalarization and remove those candidates which occur in
statements or expressions that prevent them from being split apart.  Return
@@ -1154,11 +1107,7 @@ build_accesses_from_assign (gimple stmt)
   lacc = build_access_from_expr_1 (lhs, stmt, true);
 
   if (lacc)
-{
-  lacc-grp_assignment_write = 1;
-  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT  tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (rhs, lacc))
-lacc-grp_unscalarizable_region = 1;
-}
+lacc-grp_assignment_write = 1;
 
   if (racc)
 {
@@ -1166,8 +1115,6 @@ build_accesses_from_assign (gimple stmt)
   if (should_scalarize_away_bitmap  !gimple_has_volatile_ops (stmt)
   !is_gimple_reg_type (racc-type))
bitmap_set_bit (should_scalarize_away_bitmap, DECL_UID (racc-base));
-  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT  tree_non_aligned_mem_for_access_p (lhs, racc))
-racc-grp_unscalarizable_region = 1;
 }
 
   if (lacc  racc
@@ -3835,10 +3782,6 @@ access_precludes_ipa_sra_p (struct acces
  || gimple_code (access-stmt) == GIMPLE_ASM))
 return true;
 
-  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT
-   tree_non_aligned_mem_p (access-expr, TYPE_ALIGN (access-type)))
-return true;
-
   return false;
 }
 
Index: src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
===
--- src.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
+++ src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options -O2 -fipa-sra -fdump-tree-eipa_sra-details  } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align } */
 
 struct bovid
 {