Is it intentional or not that AArch64 does not define __ARM_NEON__?
Otherwise, here's a better way to fold the test bits. AArch64 of
course does not have dN+1 overlap the high part of the qM register,
like AArch32, so the current
l = vpadd_u8 (vget_low_u8 (t), vget_high_u8 (t));
On 02/09/14 16:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
Is it intentional or not that AArch64 does not define __ARM_NEON__?
Yes I remember so, __ARM_NEON__ is not ACLE compatible so we haven't
defined it for AArch64 - on AArch32 and AArch64 we now have __ARM_NEON
defined so that's the macro to be
On 09/02/2014 08:51 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
The ADDV instruction isn't available on the AArch32 side IIRC. Given that
situation there is no intrinsic for ADDV on the AArch32 side which is why this
doesn't exist in the AArch32 version of arm_neon.h :(
Whoops, yes indeed. I clearly
