On 08/04/14 11:15, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:50 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
this adds a hash_set wrapper around hash_table, and then replaces usage of
On Aug 4, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
I had a conflict which is why I noticed this issue in the first place. And I
was using git merge :).
I bet git log or blaim would get you better data faster.
So, git merging I would recommend:
[merge]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:50 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
this adds a hash_set wrapper around hash_table, and then replaces usage of
pointer_set with it.
bootstrapped +regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
ada/
*
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:50 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
this adds a hash_set wrapper around hash_table, and then replaces usage of
pointer_set with it.
bootstrapped +regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
this adds a hash_set wrapper around hash_table, and then replaces usage of
pointer_set with it.
bootstrapped +regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
ada/
* gcc-interface/trans.c: Use hash_set instead of pointer_set.
c-family/