Re: [PATCH] bitint: Fix up lowering of bitfield loads/stores [PR114313]

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > The following testcase ICEs, because for large/huge _BitInt bitfield > loads/stores we use the DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE as the underlying > "var" and indexes into it can be larger than the precision of the > bitfield might normally allow.

[PATCH] bitint: Fix up lowering of bitfield loads/stores [PR114313]

Hi! The following testcase ICEs, because for large/huge _BitInt bitfield loads/stores we use the DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE as the underlying "var" and indexes into it can be larger than the precision of the bitfield might normally allow. The following patch fixes that by passing NULL_TREE