Re: [PATCH] bitint: Handle BIT_FIELD_REF lowering [PR114157]

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > The following patch adds support for BIT_FIELD_REF lowering with > > > large/huge _BitInt lhs. BIT_FIELD_REF requires mode argument first

Re: [PATCH] bitint: Handle BIT_FIELD_REF lowering [PR114157]

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The following patch adds support for BIT_FIELD_REF lowering with > > large/huge _BitInt lhs. BIT_FIELD_REF requires mode argument first > > operand, so the operand shouldn't be any huge

Re: [PATCH] bitint: Handle BIT_FIELD_REF lowering [PR114157]

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > The following patch adds support for BIT_FIELD_REF lowering with > large/huge _BitInt lhs. BIT_FIELD_REF requires mode argument first > operand, so the operand shouldn't be any huge _BitInt. > If we only access limbs from inside of

[PATCH] bitint: Handle BIT_FIELD_REF lowering [PR114157]

Hi! The following patch adds support for BIT_FIELD_REF lowering with large/huge _BitInt lhs. BIT_FIELD_REF requires mode argument first operand, so the operand shouldn't be any huge _BitInt. If we only access limbs from inside of BIT_FIELD_REF using constant indexes, we can just create a new