On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/21/22 09:11, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, it's a situation I didn;t anticipate and your
> > > fix
> > > is good. Could you add a comment about why you need to
On 10/21/22 09:11, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, it's a situation I didn;t anticipate and your fix
is good. Could you add a comment about why you need to propagate the values
though?
Thanks a lot, will do. Just to make sure
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/19/22 09:55, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:26 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022
On 10/19/22 09:55, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:26 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Here during stream in we end up having
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:26 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here during stream in we end up having
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:26 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here during stream in we end up having created a type variant for the enum
> > > before we read the
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Here during stream in we end up having created a type variant for the enum
> > before we read the enum's definition, and thus the variant inherited stale
> > TYPE_VALUES
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Here during stream in we end up having created a type variant for the enum
> before we read the enum's definition, and thus the variant inherited stale
> TYPE_VALUES and TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUES, which leads to an ICE (with -g).
Here during stream in we end up having created a type variant for the enum
before we read the enum's definition, and thus the variant inherited stale
TYPE_VALUES and TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUES, which leads to an ICE (with -g). The
stale variant got created from set_underlying_type during earlier stream