Hi Jakub,
on 2024/3/19 01:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The c23-stdarg-8.c test (as well as the new test below added to cover even
> more cases) FAIL on powerpc64le-linux and presumably other powerpc* targets
> as well.
> Like in the r14-9503-g218d174961 change on x86-64 we need to advance
Hi!
The c23-stdarg-8.c test (as well as the new test below added to cover even
more cases) FAIL on powerpc64le-linux and presumably other powerpc* targets
as well.
Like in the r14-9503-g218d174961 change on x86-64 we need to advance
next_cum after the hidden return pointer argument even in case
