Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/105219 - bogus max iters for vectorized epilogue

2022-04-29 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > On 27/04/2022 15:03, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Richard Biener wrote: > > > >> The following makes sure to take into account prologue peeling > >> when trying to narrow down the maximum number of iterations > >> computed

Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/105219 - bogus max iters for vectorized epilogue

2022-04-28 Thread Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches
On 27/04/2022 15:03, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Richard Biener wrote: The following makes sure to take into account prologue peeling when trying to narrow down the maximum number of iterations computed for the epilogue of a vectorized epilogue. Bootstrap & regtest running on

Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/105219 - bogus max iters for vectorized epilogue

2022-04-27 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
for trunk? Thanks, Richard. >From 03f437c9b2d5260888535e0dad570daee694e4b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Biener Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:06:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tree-optimization/105219 - bogus max iters for vectorized epilogue To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org The following makes sure to take into account p

[PATCH] tree-optimization/105219 - bogus max iters for vectorized epilogue

2022-04-27 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
The following makes sure to take into account prologue peeling when trying to narrow down the maximum number of iterations computed for the epilogue of a vectorized epilogue. Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I did not verify this solves the original aarch64 testcase yet