On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:11:50PM +, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following avoids hoisting of invariants from conditionally
> > executed parts of an if-converted loop. That now makes a difference
> > since we perform bitfield lowering even
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:11:50PM +, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following avoids hoisting of invariants from conditionally
> executed parts of an if-converted loop. That now makes a difference
> since we perform bitfield lowering even when we do not actually
> if-convert the loop.
The following avoids hoisting of invariants from conditionally
executed parts of an if-converted loop. That now makes a difference
since we perform bitfield lowering even when we do not actually
if-convert the loop. if-conversion deals with resetting flow-sensitive
info when necessary already.
