On 5/20/20 4:04 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 15:30, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/23/20 5:42 PM, Marco Elver via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hello.
Not being a maintainer of libsanitizer but I can provide a feedback:
Thank you for the review!
Note, this is not touching libsanitizer or
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 15:30, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 4/23/20 5:42 PM, Marco Elver via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Not being a maintainer of libsanitizer but I can provide a feedback:
Thank you for the review!
Note, this is not touching libsanitizer or user-space TSAN runtime,
only the
On 4/23/20 5:42 PM, Marco Elver via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hello.
Not being a maintainer of libsanitizer but I can provide a feedback:
Add support to optionally emit different instrumentation for accesses to
volatile variables. While the default TSAN runtime likely will never
require this
On 5/18/20 1:52 PM, Dmitry Vyukov via Gcc-patches wrote:
Jakub, could you please give some update. Do we just wait? That's
fine, just want to understand because there are some interesting
discussions in the kernel re bumping compiler requirements.
Thanks
Hello.
We switched to stage1 and we're
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:48 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> > Hello, Jakub,
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 16:58, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:55 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > > > FWIW this
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 16:33, Marco Elver wrote:
>
> Hello, Jakub,
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 16:58, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:55 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > > FWIW this is:
> > > >
> > > >
Hello, Jakub,
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 16:58, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:55 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > FWIW this is:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov
> > >
> > > We just landed a similar change
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:55 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > FWIW this is:
> >
> > Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov
> >
> > We just landed a similar change to llvm:
> >
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> FWIW this is:
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov
>
> We just landed a similar change to llvm:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a2c31116f412c3b6888be361137efd705e05814
>
> Do you have any objections?
I don't have
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> Add support to optionally emit different instrumentation for accesses to
> volatile variables. While the default TSAN runtime likely will never
> require this feature, other runtimes for different environments that
> have subtly different
Add support to optionally emit different instrumentation for accesses to
volatile variables. While the default TSAN runtime likely will never
require this feature, other runtimes for different environments that
have subtly different memory models or assumptions may require
distinguishing
11 matches
Mail list logo
