On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>
> On 26/09/2023 17:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > I don't have authority to approve anything, but here's a review anyway.
> >
> > Thanks for working on this.
>
> Thank you for reviewing and apologies for the mess of a patch, may have rushed
>
On 27/09/2023 08:56, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 26/09/2023 17:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
I don't have authority to approve anything, but here's a review anyway.
Thanks for working on this.
Thank you for reviewing and apologies for the mess of a patch, may have
rushed it ;)
diff --git
On 26/09/2023 17:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
I don't have authority to approve anything, but here's a review anyway.
Thanks for working on this.
Thank you for reviewing and apologies for the mess of a patch, may have
rushed it ;)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-19.c
On 26 September 2023 23:02:10 CEST, "Andre Vieira (lists)"
wrote:
>
>
>On 26/09/2023 21:26, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On 26 September 2023 18:46:11 CEST, Tobias Burnus
>> wrote:
>>> On 26.09.23 18:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
If the fall-through is deliberate please add a /*
On 26/09/2023 21:26, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 26 September 2023 18:46:11 CEST, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
On 26.09.23 18:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
If the fall-through is deliberate please add a /* FALLTHROUGH */
comment (or whatever spelling disables the warning).
It's:
On 26/09/2023 17:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:24:26PM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
@@ -5816,6 +5817,18 @@ get_references_in_stmt (gimple *stmt, vec *references)
}
case IFN_MASK_LOAD:
case IFN_MASK_STORE:
+ case
On 26 September 2023 18:46:11 CEST, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
>On 26.09.23 18:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> If the fall-through is deliberate please add a /* FALLTHROUGH */
>> comment (or whatever spelling disables the warning).
>
>It's: gcc_fallthrough ();
>
>Which gets converted to
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:24:26PM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> @@ -5816,6 +5817,18 @@ get_references_in_stmt (gimple *stmt,
> vec *references)
> }
> case IFN_MASK_LOAD:
> case IFN_MASK_STORE:
> + case IFN_MASK_CALL:
> + {
> + tree
On 26.09.23 18:37, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
If the fall-through is deliberate please add a /* FALLTHROUGH */
comment (or whatever spelling disables the warning).
It's: gcc_fallthrough ();
Which gets converted to "__attribute__((fallthrough))"; it could also
expand to "[[fallthrough]]" but that's
I don't have authority to approve anything, but here's a review anyway.
Thanks for working on this.
On 26/09/2023 17:24, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
The const attribute is ignored when simdclone's are used inbranch. This
is due to the fact that when analyzing a MASK_CALL we were not looking
The const attribute is ignored when simdclone's are used inbranch. This
is due to the fact that when analyzing a MASK_CALL we were not looking
at the targeted function for flags, but instead only at the internal
function call itself.
This patch adds code to make sure we look at the target
11 matches
Mail list logo
