Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Reduce the representation size of optabs

2012-07-24 Thread Richard Henderson
On 07/20/2012 01:39 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: I've not yet speed tested this, only completed bootstrap + test runs for both x86_64 and ppc64. I've done sanity cross compiles to alpha and mips (the only SWITCHABLE_TARGET). It would be interesting to see startup-time effects of this patch

Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Reduce the representation size of optabs

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote: While adding multiple new optabs over the past week or three, it occurred to me that (1) there are lots of places to update all in sync and (2) the representation size of optabs is huge. The first issue is somewhat

[PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Reduce the representation size of optabs

2012-07-19 Thread Richard Henderson
While adding multiple new optabs over the past week or three, it occurred to me that (1) there are lots of places to update all in sync and (2) the representation size of optabs is huge. The first issue is somewhat trivially accomplished by moving all optabs knowledge into an optabs.def file.