On 01/07/14 18:21, Kugan wrote:
On 26/06/14 20:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:41:22PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
2014-06-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* calls.c (precompute_arguments): Use new SUBREG_PROMOTED_SET
instead of SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_SET
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:52:39PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
Ok with following nit:
+/* Checks if RTX of SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P() is promoted for given SIGN. */
+#define SUBREG_CHECK_PROMOTED_SIGN(RTX, SIGN)\
+((SIGN) == SRP_POINTER ? SUBREG_PROMOTED_GET (RTX) == SRP_POINTER\
+ :
On 26/06/14 20:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:41:22PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
2014-06-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* calls.c (precompute_arguments): Use new SUBREG_PROMOTED_SET
instead of SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_SET
Missing full stop.
---
On 26/06/14 20:25, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Kugan kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org writes:
@@ -5203,24 +5203,25 @@ store_expr (tree exp, rtx target, int call_param_p,
bool nontemporal)
== TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (exp)))
{
if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (exp))
-
On 26/06/14 15:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:06:26AM +1000, Kugan wrote:
Since our aim is to perform single bit checks, why don’t we just use
this representation internally (i.e. _rtx-unchanging = 1 if SRP_SIGNED
and _rtx-volatil = 1 if SRP_UNSIGNED). As for
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:41:22PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
2014-06-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* calls.c (precompute_arguments): Use new SUBREG_PROMOTED_SET
instead of SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_SET
Missing full stop.
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@
Kugan kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org writes:
@@ -5203,24 +5203,25 @@ store_expr (tree exp, rtx target, int call_param_p,
bool nontemporal)
== TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (exp)))
{
if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (exp))
- != SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
@@ -5234,14 +5235,14 @@ store_expr (tree exp, rtx target, int call_param_p,
bool nontemporal)
if (CONSTANT_P (temp) GET_MODE (temp) == VOIDmode)
{
temp = convert_modes (GET_MODE (target), TYPE_MODE
+const unsigned int SRP_POINTER = -1;
+const unsigned int SRP_SIGNED = 0;
+const unsigned int SRP_UNSIGNED = 1;
+const unsigned int SRP_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED = 2;
But most importantly, I thought Richard Henderson suggested
to use SRP_POINTER 0, SRP_SIGNED 1, SRP_UNSIGNED 2,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:21:08PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
The problem with SRP_POINTER 0, SRP_SIGNED 1, SRP_UNSIGNED 2,
SRP_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED 3 (as I understand) is that, it will be
incompatible with TYPE_UNSIGNED (tree) and defines of
POINTER_EXTEND_UNSIGNED values. We will have to then
On 26/06/14 11:06, Kugan wrote:
On 25/06/14 17:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:21:08PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
The problem with SRP_POINTER 0, SRP_SIGNED 1, SRP_UNSIGNED 2,
SRP_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED 3 (as I understand) is that, it will be
incompatible with TYPE_UNSIGNED (tree)
Changes the the SUBREG flags to be able to set promoted for sign
(SRP_SIGNED), unsigned (SRP_UNSIGNED), sign and unsigned
(SPR_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED) in SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
* gcc/calls.c (precompute_arguments):
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:51:51PM +1000, Kugan wrote:
Changes the the SUBREG flags to be able to set promoted for sign
(SRP_SIGNED), unsigned (SRP_UNSIGNED), sign and unsigned
(SPR_SIGNED_AND_UNSIGNED) in SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P.
2014-06-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
