On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 14:54, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/14/20 1:50 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:49, Kyrill Tkachov
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> On 12/17/19 3:31 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>> On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On
On 1/14/20 1:50 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:49, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 12/17/19 3:31 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 11/18/19 9:00 AM,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:49, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On 12/17/19 3:31 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >
> > On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Christophe,
> >>>
> >>> On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe
Hi Christophe,
On 12/17/19 3:31 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 16:31, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
> >>>
On 12/17/19 2:33 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
On 18/10/2019
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 18/10/2019
Hi Christophe,
On 11/18/19 9:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> wrote:
> >
> > On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > + bool not_supported = arm_arch_notm || flag_pic
Ping?
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 18:19, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
> Le jeu. 5 déc. 2019 à 11:13, Christophe Lyon a
> écrit :
>>
>> ping?
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01667.html
>>
>> Kyrill approved the previous version modulo a typo fix, but Richard
>> wanted a better
Ping?
Le jeu. 5 déc. 2019 à 11:13, Christophe Lyon a
écrit :
> ping?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01667.html
>
> Kyrill approved the previous version modulo a typo fix, but Richard
> wanted a better name for a variable.
> Is that version OK?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01667.html
Kyrill approved the previous version modulo a typo fix, but Richard
wanted a better name for a variable.
Is that version OK?
Thanks,
Christophe
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 16:29, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov
ping?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 10:00, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > > + bool not_supported =
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 15:46, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> wrote:
> >
> > On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > + bool not_supported = arm_arch_notm || flag_pic || TARGET_NEON;
> > >
> >
> > This is a poor name in the
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:17, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > +thumb1_gen_const_int (rtx op0, HOST_WIDE_INT op1)
> > +{
> > + bool mov_done_p = false;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* Emit upper 3 bytes if needed. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < 3;
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > + bool not_supported = arm_arch_notm || flag_pic || TARGET_NEON;
> >
>
> This is a poor name in the context of the function as a whole. What's
> not supported. Please think of
Hi Kyrill,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 11:34, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On 10/18/19 2:18 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch extends support for -mpure-code to all thumb-1 processors,
> > by removing the need for MOVT.
> >
> > Symbol addresses are built using
On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
+thumb1_gen_const_int (rtx op0, HOST_WIDE_INT op1)
+{
+ bool mov_done_p = false;
+ int i;
+
+ /* Emit upper 3 bytes if needed. */
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+{
+ int byte = (op1 >> (8 * (3 - i))) & 0xff;
+
+ if (byte)
+ {
+
On 18/10/2019 14:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
+ bool not_supported = arm_arch_notm || flag_pic || TARGET_NEON;
This is a poor name in the context of the function as a whole. What's
not supported. Please think of a better name so that I have some idea
what the intention is.
R.
Hi Christophe,
On 10/18/19 2:18 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
This patch extends support for -mpure-code to all thumb-1 processors,
by removing the need for MOVT.
Symbol addresses are built using upper8_15, upper0_7, lower8_15 and
lower0_7 relocations, and constants are built using sequences
ping^2 ?
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 16:07, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01356.html
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 15:18, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch extends support for -mpure-code to all thumb-1 processors,
> > by
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01356.html
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 15:18, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch extends support for -mpure-code to all thumb-1 processors,
> by removing the need for MOVT.
>
> Symbol addresses are built using upper8_15, upper0_7,
b7ad1a31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Lyon
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:15:12 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [ARM] Add support for -mpure-code in thumb-1 (v6m)
This patch extends support for -mpure-code to all thumb-1 processors,
by removing the need for MOVT.
Symbol addresses are built
22 matches
Mail list logo
