On 06/21/2012 02:27 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:36 PM, rbmjr...@verizon.net wrote:
My issue is that I'm uncomfortable with this, as it seems *too* easy.
I'd just be comfortable with a stake in the ground and press forward. I do
think this covers most all the cases.
With
On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:09 PM, rbmj wrote:
I also do not know how to run the test suite for the target system
(powerpc-wrs-vxworks). I would think some sort of powerpc simulator, but I
don't have a firmware image for VxWorks - just headers and embedded hardware.
To test well, you need to be
On 06/25/2012 04:02 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:09 PM, rbmj wrote:
I also do not know how to run the test suite for the target system
(powerpc-wrs-vxworks). I would think some sort of powerpc simulator, but I
don't have a firmware image for VxWorks - just headers and
On Jun 25, 2012, at 1:15 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 06/25/2012 04:02 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:09 PM, rbmj wrote:
I also do not know how to run the test suite for the target system
(powerpc-wrs-vxworks). I would think some sort of powerpc simulator, but I
don't have a firmware
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:36 PM, rbmj r...@verizon.net wrote:
My issue is that I'm uncomfortable with this, as it seems *too* easy.
I'd just be comfortable with a stake in the ground and press forward. I do
think this covers most all the cases.
On 06/12/2012 04:20 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
to be
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
Since u?int.*_t are already defined, would this work? Or should I use the
non-typedef'd versions? Also, I'm not exactly sure how to run the regression
tests with a cross compiler. I'm still new to everything, bear with me :-)
You have to use the non-typedef
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
to be fully compliant to the standard. Fixes broken libstdc++.
If you're touching VxWorks stdint.h perhaps you could also define the
On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
to be fully compliant to the standard. Fixes broken libstdc++.
If you're touching
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
to be fully compliant to the standard.
| 44
1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
From a50ecd253f6e7fa4a6558ebce0578c5f48ccbc17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: rbmj r...@verizon.net
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:26:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] Add stdint.h wrapper for VxWorks
11 matches
Mail list logo
