Re: [PATCH 7/7] PowerPC test: Add prefixed stack protect test

2020-06-27 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 01:50:48AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:18:42PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > > > +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ > > > > Is this test necessary anymore, does -mcpu=power10 not

Re: [PATCH 7/7] PowerPC test: Add prefixed stack protect test

2020-06-26 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:18:42PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are > > using large stack frame for -mcpu=future. > > > > 2020-06-01

Re: [PATCH 7/7] PowerPC test: Add prefixed stack protect test

2020-06-25 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are > using large stack frame for -mcpu=future. > > 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner > > * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test. >

[PATCH 7/7] PowerPC test: Add prefixed stack protect test

2020-06-01 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are using large stack frame for -mcpu=future. 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test. --- .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c| 20