On 14 Jul 2015, at 18:45, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2015, at 18:24, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On 06/18/2015 04:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> The patch below pushes -static-libstdc++ onto the output command line (for
>>> targets without -Bstatic/dynamic) so that such specs have an
On 06/18/2015 04:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
The patch below pushes -static-libstdc++ onto the output command line (for
targets without -Bstatic/dynamic) so that such specs have an opportunity to
fire.
Won't that produce an unrecognized flag error from the linker?
Jason
On 14 Jul 2015, at 18:24, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/18/2015 04:12 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
The patch below pushes -static-libstdc++ onto the output command line (for
targets without -Bstatic/dynamic) so that such specs have an opportunity to
fire.
Won't that produce an unrecognized flag
Ping
On 18 Jun 2015, at 09:12, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
This came up in a User question last night and reminded me that I had a patch
for it in my Q.
Usually g++ driver support for -static-libstdc++ is provided by -Bstatic
-lstdc++ -Bdynamic and is currently disabled for targets
Hi,
This came up in a User question last night and reminded me that I had a patch
for it in my Q.
Usually g++ driver support for -static-libstdc++ is provided by -Bstatic
-lstdc++ -Bdynamic and is currently disabled for targets without that linker
support. However, actually, there is
