This is ok -- sorry, I thought I'd already acked this
On 12/16/23 06:03, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638089.html
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:32:13PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11:58PM -0500, Nathan
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638089.html.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:32:13PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11:58PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 11/14/23 01:24, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > I'll also note that the comments
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638089.html
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:32:13PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11:58PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 11/14/23 01:24, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > I'll also note that the comments
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11:58PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/14/23 01:24, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > I'll also note that the comments above the parsing functions here no
> > longer exactly match with the grammar in the standard, should they be
> > updated as well?
>
> please.
>
As I
