On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:56:46AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Sorry for breaking this. With the constant changes in the
> > patterns this is supposed to fix it seems I've lost track of the
> > status quo. I'll check what
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Sorry for breaking this. With the constant changes in the
> patterns this is supposed to fix it seems I've lost track of the
> status quo. I'll check what went wrong with the patch; in the
> mean time Andreas will revert this, or if
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 04:00 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:19:13PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >
> > > [ I did not see this patch before, sorry. ]
> > >
> > > This causes the second
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:00:25AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:19:13PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > [ I did not see this patch before, sorry. ]
> > >
> > > This causes the second half of
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:19:13PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > [ I did not see this patch before, sorry. ]
> >
> > This causes the second half of PR78638.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Dominik Vogt
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:19:13PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> [ I did not see this patch before, sorry. ]
>
> This causes the second half of PR78638.
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/combine.c
> > +++ b/gcc/combine.c
> > @@ -5600,6 +5600,18
[ I did not see this patch before, sorry. ]
This causes the second half of PR78638.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> --- a/gcc/combine.c
> +++ b/gcc/combine.c
> @@ -5600,6 +5600,18 @@ combine_simplify_rtx (rtx x, machine_mode op0_mode,
> int in_dest,
>
On Dez 01 2016, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Suppress replacement of
> "(and (reg) (const_int bit))" with "if_then_else".
That causes a regression on ia64.
FAIL: gcc.target/ia64/builtin-popcount-2.c
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Suppress replacement of
> "(and (reg) (const_int bit))" with "if_then_else".
Applied. Thanks!
-Andreas-
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:33:17PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 01:36 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
> >index b22a274..457fe8a 100644
> >--- a/gcc/combine.c
> >+++ b/gcc/combine.c
> >@@ -5575,10 +5575,23 @@ combine_simplify_rtx (rtx x,
10 matches
Mail list logo