On 30/08/16 09:01, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 11/08/16 15:13, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> On 25/07/16 11:52, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>>> On 11/07/16 17:56, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>>>> On 07/07/16 13:30, mickael guene wrote:
>>>>> Hi Andre,
>>>>>
>>>>>  Another feedback on your purecode patch.
>>>>>  You have to disable casesi pattern since then it will
>>>>> generate wrong code with -mpure-code option.
>>>>>  Indeed it will generate an 'adr rx, .Lx' (aka
>>>>> 'subs rx, PC, #offset') which will not work in our
>>>>> case since 'Lx' label is put in an .rodata section.
>>>>> So offset value is unknown and can be impossible
>>>>> to encode correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Mickael
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/30/2016 04:32 PM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds the -mpure-code option for ARM. This option ensures
>>>>>> functions are put into sections that contain only code and no data. To
>>>>>> ensure this throughout compilation we give these sections the ARM
>>>>>> processor-specific ELF section attribute "SHF_ARM_PURECODE". This option
>>>>>> is only supported for non-pic code for armv7-m targets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch introduces a new target hook 'TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC'.
>>>>>> This target hook enables a target to use the numeric value for elf
>>>>>> section attributes rather than their alphabetical representation. If
>>>>>> TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC returns TRUE, the existing
>>>>>> 'default_elf_asm_named_section', will print the numeric value of the
>>>>>> section attributes for the current section. This target hook has two
>>>>>> parameters:
>>>>>> unsigned int FLAGS, the input parameter that tells the function the
>>>>>> current section's attributes;
>>>>>> unsigned int *NUM, used to pass down the numerical representation of the
>>>>>> section's attributes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The default implementation for TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC will return
>>>>>> false, so existing behavior is not changed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bootstrapped and tested for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Further tested for
>>>>>> arm-none-eabi with a Cortex-M3 target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>> 2016-06-30  Andre Vieira  <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
>>>>>>             Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         * target.def (elf_flags_numeric): New target hook.
>>>>>>         * targhooks.h (default_asm_elf_flags_numeric): New.
>>>>>>         * varasm.c (default_asm_elf_flags_numeric): New.
>>>>>>           (default_elf_asm_named_section): Use new target hook.
>>>>>>         * config/arm/arm.opt (mpure-code): New.
>>>>>>         * config/arm/arm.h (SECTION_ARM_PURECODE): New.
>>>>>>         * config/arm/arm.c (arm_asm_init_sections): Add section
>>>>>>           attribute to default text section if -mpure-code.
>>>>>>           (arm_option_check_internal): Diagnose use of option with
>>>>>>           non supported targets and/or options.
>>>>>>           (arm_asm_elf_flags_numeric): New.
>>>>>>           (arm_function_section): New.
>>>>>>           (arm_elf_section_type_flags): New.
>>>>>>         * config/arm/elf.h (JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION): Disable
>>>>>>           for -mpure-code.
>>>>>>         * gcc/doc/texi (TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC): New.
>>>>>>         * gcc/doc/texi.in (TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC): Likewise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>> 2016-06-30  Andre Vieira  <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
>>>>>>             Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/ffunction-sections.c: New.
>>>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/no-literal-pool.c: New.
>>>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pure-code.exp: New.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Sandra, Mickael,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your comments. I changed the description of -mpure-code in
>>>> invoke.texi to better reflect the error message you get wrt supported
>>>> targets.
>>>>
>>>> As for the target hook description, I hope the text is clearer now. Let
>>>> me know if you think it needs further explanation.
>>>>
>>>> I also fixed the double '%' in the text string for unnamed text sections
>>>> and disabled the casesi pattern.
>>>>
>>>> I duplicated the original casesi test
>>>> 'gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46934.c' for pure-code to make
>>>> sure the casesi was disabled and other patterns were selected instead.
>>>>
>>>> Reran regressions for pure-code.exp for Cortex-M3.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Andre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>> 2016-07-11  Andre Vieira  <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
>>>>             Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>>         * target.def (elf_flags_numeric): New target hook.
>>>>         * hooks.c (hook_uint_uintp_false): New generic hook.
>>>>         * varasm.c (default_elf_asm_named_section): Use new target hook.
>>>>         * config/arm/arm.opt (mpure-code): New.
>>>>         * config/arm/arm.h (SECTION_ARM_PURECODE): New.
>>>>         * config/arm/arm.c (arm_asm_init_sections): Add section
>>>>         attribute to default text section if -mpure-code.
>>>>         (arm_option_check_internal): Diagnose use of option with
>>>>         non supported targets and/or options.
>>>>         (arm_asm_elf_flags_numeric): New.
>>>>         (arm_function_section): New.
>>>>         (arm_elf_section_type_flags): New.
>>>>         * config/arm/elf.h (JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION): Disable
>>>>         for -mpure-code.
>>>>         * config/arm/arm.md (casesi): Disable pattern for
>>>>         -mpure-code.
>>>>         * gcc/doc/texi (TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC): New.
>>>>         * gcc/doc/texi.in (TARGET_ASM_ELF_FLAGS_NUMERIC): Likewise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>> 2016-07-11  Andre Vieira  <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
>>>>             Terry Guo  <terry....@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/ffunction-sections.c: New.
>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/no-literal-pool.c: New.
>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/no-casesi.c: New.
>>>>         * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pure-code.exp: New.
>>>>
>>> Ping.
>>>
>> Ping
>>
> 
> Ping
> 
Ping

Reply via email to