On 06/09/2019 11:15, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c (Revision 0)
+++
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c
> ===
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c (Revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligne
On 9/5/19 11:21 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 04/09/2019 16:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 04/09/2019 16:00, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 9/4/19 4:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 04/09/2019 14:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (
On 04/09/2019 16:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 04/09/2019 16:00, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 4:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 04/09/2019 14:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argume
On 04/09/2019 16:00, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 4:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 04/09/2019 14:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c
===
On 9/4/19 4:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 04/09/2019 14:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-2.c
>>> ===
>>> --- gcc/te
On 04/09/2019 14:28, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 15/08/2019 20:47, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 8/15/19 6:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please split it into the parts for the PR and parts making the
asserts not trigger.
Yes, will do.
Okay, here
On 9/4/19 2:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 15/08/2019 20:47, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 8/15/19 6:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Please split it into the parts for the PR and parts making the
> asserts not trigger.
>
Yes, will do.
>>
>> Okay, here is t
On 15/08/2019 20:47, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 8/15/19 6:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please split it into the parts for the PR and parts making the
asserts not trigger.
Yes, will do.
Okay, here is the rest of the PR 89544 fix,
actually just an optimization, making the larger stack alignme
Ah, yes that was unexpected...
Sorry for the breakage.
So this needs to be known_eq (STACK_POINTER_OFFSET, 0)
instead of STACK_POINTER_OFFSET == 0 obviously.
Should be fixed by this patch, which I am going to commit
as "obvious" in a moment unless someone objects.
Thanks
Bernd.
On 8/20/19 4:3
On 2019-08-15 3:47 p.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> 2019-08-15 Bernd Edlinger
>
> PR middle-end/89544
> * function.c (assign_parm_find_stack_rtl): Use larger alignment
> when possible.
This patch breaks build on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pk
On 8/15/19 1:47 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 8/15/19 6:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please split it into the parts for the PR and parts making the
asserts not trigger.
>>> Yes, will do.
>>>
> Okay, here is the rest of the PR 89544 fix,
> actually just an optimization, making the la
On 8/15/19 6:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> Please split it into the parts for the PR and parts making the
>>> asserts not trigger.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, will do.
>>
Okay, here is the rest of the PR 89544 fix,
actually just an optimization, making the larger stack alignment
known to the middle-end,
13 matches
Mail list logo
