On 08/17/2018 03:14 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> After the other patch has been applied, I re-based this patch accordingly.
>
> Except the mechanical changes, there are a few notable differences to the
> previous version:
>
> In string_constant, I added a similar check for the
On 08/18/18 06:01, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/17/2018 03:14 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> After the other patch has been applied, I re-based this patch accordingly.
>>
>> Except the mechanical changes, there are a few notable differences to the
>> previous version:
>>
>> In
On 08/17/2018 03:14 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> After the other patch has been applied, I re-based this patch accordingly.
>
> Except the mechanical changes, there are a few notable differences to the
> previous version:
>
> In string_constant, I added a similar check for the
Hi!
After the other patch has been applied, I re-based this patch accordingly.
Except the mechanical changes, there are a few notable differences to the
previous version:
In string_constant, I added a similar check for the STRING_CSTs
because when callers don't use mem_size, they assume to be
On 08/13/18 16:27, Martin Sebor wrote:
> As I said below, the patch for PR 86552, 86711, 86714 that
> was first posted on July 19 fixes both of these issues and
> also diagnoses calls with unterminated strings:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00155.html
>
Sorry, but you you
As I said below, the patch for PR 86552, 86711, 86714 that
was first posted on July 19 fixes both of these issues and
also diagnoses calls with unterminated strings:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00155.html
On 08/12/2018 03:06 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ping
Hi,
I'd like to ping for this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01800.html
I will add a new BZ entry for the (minor) regression this patch
introduces in gcc.dg/strlenopt-49.c and assign it to myself.
Thanks
Bernd.
On 07/29/18 12:56, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This
