On 25/03/2013, at 10:15 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com wrote:
...
Richard,
As release manager, do you have any objections to backporting this patch to
4.8 branch? It affects only VxWorks targets and it is quite harmless (the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com wrote:
On 20/03/2013, at 1:35 AM, rbmj wrote:
On 19-Mar-13 03:04, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Will commit to trunk once the server is up.
The patch is now committed.
Regarding 4.8, we should've really tried to work it out
It looks like this message didn't go through; if you get this multiple
times I apologize. I've been having issues so I don't trust that it
sent correctly :/
On 19-Mar-13 03:04, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Will commit to trunk once the server is up.
Regarding 4.8, we should've really tried to
On 20/03/2013, at 1:35 AM, rbmj wrote:
On 19-Mar-13 03:04, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Will commit to trunk once the server is up.
The patch is now committed.
Regarding 4.8, we should've really tried to work it out earlier. If you
want to pursue backport to 4.8, please attach the log of PPA
On 19/03/2013, at 3:38 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 16-Feb-13 23:21, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 14/02/2013, at 10:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
Here's the updated, (trivial) patch.
Thanks. I'll apply this once 4.8 branches and trunk is back into
development mode.
Since GCC 4.9 has branched now are you
On 16-Feb-13 23:21, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 14/02/2013, at 10:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
Here's the updated, (trivial) patch.
Thanks. I'll apply this once 4.8 branches and trunk is back into development
mode.
Since GCC 4.9 has branched now are you still willing to commit (maybe
after the
On 14/02/2013, at 10:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
On 18-Jan-13 20:35, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 19/01/2013, at 9:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
-150,7 +158,7 @@ static __gthread_once_t tls_init_guard =
need to read tls_keys.dtor[key] atomically. */
static void
-tls_delete_hook (void *tcb
On 18-Jan-13 20:35, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 19/01/2013, at 9:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
-150,7 +158,7 @@ static __gthread_once_t tls_init_guard =
need to read tls_keys.dtor[key] atomically. */
static void
-tls_delete_hook (void *tcb ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+tls_delete_hook (void *tcb)
Don't
On 17-Jan-13 20:18, Mike Stump wrote:
You are now entered into the most ignored and most trivial gcc patch
contest. You presently are behind the leader, but, if you can get
another 10 pings in before approval, you can win! Good luck.
Thanks. I know it's trivial, but 1. it's not hard to
On 19/01/2013, at 9:18 AM, rbmj wrote:
-150,7 +158,7 @@ static __gthread_once_t tls_init_guard =
need to read tls_keys.dtor[key] atomically. */
static void
-tls_delete_hook (void *tcb ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+tls_delete_hook (void *tcb)
Don't remove ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED. TCB was and will
On 05-Jan-13 23:18, rbmj wrote:
On 06-Dec-12 10:14, rbmj wrote:
On 26-Nov-12 13:27, rbmj wrote:
On 11/13/2012 10:22 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 11/5/2012 12:57 PM, rbmj wrote:
This removes warnings about implicit declarations and fixes one of the
function calls in vxlib-tls.c for vxworks targets.
I
On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:05 PM, rbmj r...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05-Jan-13 23:18, rbmj wrote:
On 06-Dec-12 10:14, rbmj wrote:
On 26-Nov-12 13:27, rbmj wrote:
On 11/13/2012 10:22 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 11/5/2012 12:57 PM, rbmj wrote:
This removes warnings about implicit declarations and fixes one of
On 18/01/2013, at 2:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:05 PM, rbmj r...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05-Jan-13 23:18, rbmj wrote:
On 06-Dec-12 10:14, rbmj wrote:
On 26-Nov-12 13:27, rbmj wrote:
On 11/13/2012 10:22 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 11/5/2012 12:57 PM, rbmj wrote:
This removes
13 matches
Mail list logo
