Re: [PR libmudflap/53952] don't check access to non-mem decls

2012-12-06 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote: SRA (and perhaps other passes?) introduce “addressable” MEM_REFs to variables that were not addressable at the time mudflap1 ran registering valid memory ranges; when mudflap2 ran to emit the checks, it found such

[PR libmudflap/53952] don't check access to non-mem decls

2012-12-05 Thread Alexandre Oliva
SRA (and perhaps other passes?) introduce “addressable” MEM_REFs to variables that were not addressable at the time mudflap1 ran registering valid memory ranges; when mudflap2 ran to emit the checks, it found such MEM_REFs, marking the variables as addressable and emitting checks that will fail at