On 12/05/2016 11:07 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/29/2016 09:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This fixes the gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6* failures I seem to have caused on
some non x86 platforms. Sorry for the delay.
The problem is that my fix for PR61409 had the logic backwards. I was
proving that all the
On 11/29/2016 09:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This fixes the gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6* failures I seem to have caused on
some non x86 platforms. Sorry for the delay.
The problem is that my fix for PR61409 had the logic backwards. I was
proving that all the uses of a PHI are invalidated by any one
On 29 November 2016 at 17:49, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 29 November 2016 at 17:33, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> This fixes the gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6* failures I seem to have caused on some
>> non x86 platforms. Sorry for the delay.
>>
>> The problem is
On 29 November 2016 at 17:33, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> This fixes the gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6* failures I seem to have caused on some
> non x86 platforms. Sorry for the delay.
>
> The problem is that my fix for PR61409 had the logic backwards. I was
> proving that all the uses of a
This fixes the gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6* failures I seem to have caused on
some non x86 platforms. Sorry for the delay.
The problem is that my fix for PR61409 had the logic backwards. I was
proving that all the uses of a PHI are invalidated by any one undefined
PHI path, whereas what we want is