Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The test uses the largest available floating-point number - be it 8, 10
or 16 - and tests for that. The checks should be thus OK for any system.
It fails with a link
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The test uses the largest available floating-point number - be it 8, 10
or 16 - and tests for that. The
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
Please no: sqrtl is a C99 addition, and we don't want lists of non-C99
targets in tests that require them.
OK, so, then we simply accept that running a regression test
on these targets will always FAIL? If the answer is 'yes',
then
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 17:41, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
Please no: sqrtl is a C99 addition, and we don't want lists of non-C99
targets in tests that require them.
OK, so, then we simply accept that running a
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
Please no: sqrtl is a C99 addition, and we don't want lists of non-C99
targets in tests that require them.
OK, so, then we simply accept that running a regression test
On 11/08/2011 05:10 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 17:41, Rainer Orthr...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Steve Kargls...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu writes:
Please no: sqrtl is a C99 addition, and we don't want lists of non-C99
targets in tests that require them.
OK,
I have a few questions:
(1) Is sqrtl the only missing Fortran intrinsic?
(2) Is there a list of missing intrinsics and platforms?
(3) Does it make any sense to support REAL(10) if sqrtl
is missing?
Cheers,
Dominique
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 07:35:40PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
I have a few questions:
(1) Is sqrtl the only missing Fortran intrinsic?
(2) Is there a list of missing intrinsics and platforms?
This is definitely platform dependent. For amd64-*freebsd,
troutmask:sgk[210] gmake
The test uses the largest available floating-point number - be it 8, 10
or 16 - and tests for that. The checks should be thus OK for any system.
It fails with a link failure on SPARC Solaris 8 and 9:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The test uses the largest available floating-point number - be it 8, 10
or 16 - and tests for that. The checks should be thus OK for any system.
It fails with a link failure on SPARC Solaris 8 and 9:
FAIL:
Motivated by the report at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/6373a2dfe64f0b83
There is currently no run-test check that libquadmath actually works.
The attached and committed (Rev. 181015) adds one which tests for
libquadmath that I/O read/write works.
11 matches
Mail list logo
