On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just submitted this PR, and the patch as well, which passes the
> testsuite.
>
> The problem is a missing deep copy when the rhs is a (scalar) derived type
> constructor (with allocatable components) and
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:33:33AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just submitted this PR, and the patch as well, which passes the
> > testsuite.
> >
> > The problem is a missing deep copy when the rhs is a
Hello,
I've just submitted this PR, and the patch as well, which passes the
testsuite.
The problem is a missing deep copy when the rhs is a (scalar) derived
type constructor (with allocatable components) and the lhs an array.
The patch removes the nonconstantness condition, so that the
Dear Mikael,
Apart from the regtesting, this patch is 'obvious'. This is good for
trunk and, I would suggest, after a decent interval 5 branch.
Thanks for the PR and the patch.
Paul
On 26 September 2015 at 15:10, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just submitted this