On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Montag, 27. August 2018 15:37:15 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > > Patch updated. I specifically edited a number of the existing tests that
> > > used both -r and -nostdlib and removed
On Montag, 27. August 2018 15:37:15 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > Patch updated. I specifically edited a number of the existing tests that
> > used both -r and -nostdlib and removed -nostdlib so the patch is
> > exercised by existing tests. The
On Montag, 27. August 2018 15:37:15 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > Patch updated. I specifically edited a number of the existing tests that
> > used both -r and -nostdlib and removed -nostdlib so the patch is
> > exercised by existing tests. The
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Patch updated. I specifically edited a number of the existing tests that used
> both -r and -nostdlib and removed -nostdlib so the patch is exercised by
> existing tests. The patch bootstrapped, I didn't notice any relevant failures
> when
On Donnerstag, 23. August 2018 23:24:02 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > Joseph: As a side-comment, is there a reason that we don’t exclude
> > gomp/itm/fortran/gcov from the link for -nostdlib / -nodefaultlib?
> >
> > If we are relying on the lib self-specs
On Dienstag, 21. August 2018 00:38:58 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > > I think you're changing the wrong place for this. If you want -r to be
> > > usable with GCC without using -nostdlib (which is an interesting
> > > question), you actually need
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Joseph: As a side-comment, is there a reason that we don’t exclude
> gomp/itm/fortran/gcov from the link for -nostdlib / -nodefaultlib?
>
> If we are relying on the lib self-specs for this, then we’re not
> succeeding since the one we build at the
> On 20 Aug 2018, at 23:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
>>> I think you're changing the wrong place for this. If you want -r to be
>>> usable with GCC without using -nostdlib (which is an interesting
>>> question), you actually need to change
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > I think you're changing the wrong place for this. If you want -r to be
> > usable with GCC without using -nostdlib (which is an interesting
> > question), you actually need to change LINK_COMMAND_SPEC (also sometimes
> > overridden for
On Freitag, 3. August 2018 13:56:12 CEST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 1. August 2018 18:32:30 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > > gcc/
> > >
> > > * gcc.c: Correct default specs for -r
> >
> > I don't follow why your changes
Hi Allan,
> On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:56, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 1. August 2018 18:32:30 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>>> gcc/
>
> 2018-07-29 Allan Sandfeld Jensen
>
> gcc/doc
>
>* invoke.texi: Document -r
>
> gcc/
>
On Mittwoch, 1. August 2018 18:32:30 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > gcc/
> >
> > * gcc.c: Correct default specs for -r
>
> I don't follow why your changes (which would need describing for each
> individual spec changed) are corrections.
>
> >
On Mittwoch, 1. August 2018 18:32:30 CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > gcc/
> >
> > * gcc.c: Correct default specs for -r
>
> I don't follow why your changes (which would need describing for each
> individual spec changed) are corrections.
>
> >
Hi Allan,
> The option has existed and been working for years,
> make sure it implies the right extra options, and list
> it in the documentation.
this is way incomplete: you are only fixing the default versions of the
various specs in gcc.c, while there are many others that also need
fixing in
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> gcc/
> * gcc.c: Correct default specs for -r
I don't follow why your changes (which would need describing for each
individual spec changed) are corrections.
> /* config.h can define LIB_SPEC to override the default libraries. */
>
The option has existed and been working for years,
make sure it implies the right extra options, and list
it in the documentation.
2018-08-01 Allan Sandfeld Jensen
gcc/doc
* invoke.texi: Document -r
gcc/
* gcc.c: Correct default specs for -r
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 7 ++-
16 matches
Mail list logo