On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252
Ironically, this revision fixes a reload
Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252
On 01/27/2013 03:26 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252
Ironically, this revision fixes a reload problem on x86/x86_64 --
which
On 01/27/2013 03:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
If not, it'll probably need release manager approval before it can go
in.
Please attach your patch to PR54814 and attach PR 54814 to the 4.9
pending patches meta bug.
Does this mean the fix is rejected for 4.8?
Not necessarily. We're in a
On 01/28/2013 06:55 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
Georg-Johann Lay schrieb:
Jeff Law schrieb:
On 01/25/2013 11:41 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
PR54814 causes spill fails because reload.c:find_valid_class_1 tests
only one
hard register instead of all hard registers of regno:mode in rclass:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54814
The patch was originally
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
I found no 4.9 meta-bug in the 47 meta-bugs. You have th PR?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55996
--
Marc Glisse
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252
Ironically, this revision fixes a reload problem on x86/x86_64 --
which doesn't use reload anymore now...
Does this
PR54814 causes spill fails because reload.c:find_valid_class_1 tests only one
hard register instead of all hard registers of regno:mode in rclass:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54814
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
introduced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252
The
On 01/25/2013 11:41 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
PR54814 causes spill fails because reload.c:find_valid_class_1 tests only one
hard register instead of all hard registers of regno:mode in rclass:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54814
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a
Jeff Law schrieb:
On 01/25/2013 11:41 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
PR54814 causes spill fails because reload.c:find_valid_class_1 tests
only one
hard register instead of all hard registers of regno:mode in rclass:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54814
The patch was originally worked out by Bernd
11 matches
Mail list logo