2014-06-29 20:47 GMT+02:00 Tim Shen :
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Alternatively, we could just make them local statics instead of member
>> data and still remove the duplciation (see attached).
>
> This is a good idea. Can we use constexpr for the functions/static
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Alternatively, we could just make them local statics instead of member
> data and still remove the duplciation (see attached).
This is a good idea. Can we use constexpr for the functions/static variables?
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
On 11/01/14 19:48 -0500, Tim Shen wrote:
Here're 4 patches that finally led the _Compiler's instantiation and
some other optimization for compiling time.
1) Create class _ScannerBase to make _Scanner pithier. Move const
static members to src/c++11/regex.cc.
I think it might be time to revisit
Hi
> On 12/gen/2014, at 01:48, Tim Shen wrote:
>
> Here're 4 patches that finally led the _Compiler's instantiation and
> some other optimization for compiling time.
>
> 1) Create class _ScannerBase to make _Scanner pithier. Move const
> static members to src/c++11/regex.cc.
> 2) Make _Compiler
