Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan >> Cc: Andrew Pinski; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap >> assumptions. >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan >> <venkataramanan.ku...@amd.

RE: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:33 PM > >> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan > >> Cc: Andrew Pinski; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > >> Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c > >> trap assumpti

RE: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

Hi Richard and Bernhard. > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:33 PM > To: Kumar, Venkataramanan > Cc: Andrew Pinski; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC]

Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

On November 10, 2015 1:02:57 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Biener wrote: >On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan > wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> I have now implemented storing of DR and references using hash maps. >> Please find

Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I have now implemented storing of DR and references using hash maps. > Please find attached patch. > > As discussed, I am now storing the ref, DR and baseref, DR pairs along with >

[RFC] [PATCH V2]: RE: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions.

Hi Richard, > -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 5:00 PM > To: Kumar, Venkataramanan > Cc: Andrew Pinski; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch] Relax tree-if-conv.c trap assumptions. > > On Fri,