On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ira Rosen i...@il.ibm.com wrote:
gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 20/04/2011 02:24:55 PM:
Hi,
In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is
expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is
necessary
here
gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 20/04/2011 02:24:55 PM:
Hi,
In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is
expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is
necessary
here except for having the array bases aligned. This patch removes xfail
Hi,
In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is
expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is necessary
here except for having the array bases aligned. This patch removes xfail
for vect_no_align (and increases a loop bound in slp-3.c to prevent