Hi Kaz,
The failure turned out to be issues with the profile count and handling
or region partitioning. So, I prefer to handle those separately,
For now, I disable shrink-wrap when partitioning, even if the problem
seems to have disappeared with the more constrained heuristics. This is
probably
Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
The failure turned out to be issues with the profile count and handling
or region partitioning. So, I prefer to handle those separately,
For now, I disable shrink-wrap when partitioning, even if the problem
seems to have disappeared with the more
On 09/11/2012 12:28 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:51 +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
twice from the return and epilogue patterns and the
On 09/11/2012 03:05 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
twice from the return and epilogue patterns and the
This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
twice from the return and epilogue patterns and the
sh_expand_prologue parameter type.
No regressions with sh-superh-elf and sh4-linux gcc testsuites.
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:51 +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
twice from the return and epilogue patterns and the
sh_expand_prologue parameter type.
No
