Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote: > Would it be OK to add support for: > > [[__extension__ ...]] > > to suppress the pedwarn about using [[]] prior to C2X? Then we can That seems like a plausible feature to add. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Joseph Myers writes: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Michael Matz via Gcc-patches wrote: > >> So, essentially you want unignorable attributes, right? Then implement >> exactly that: add one new keyword "__known_attribute__" (invent a better >> name, maybe :) ), semantics exactly as with __attribute__

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Michael Matz via Gcc-patches wrote: > So, essentially you want unignorable attributes, right? Then implement > exactly that: add one new keyword "__known_attribute__" (invent a better > name, maybe :) ), semantics exactly as with __attribute__ (including using > the same

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Jason Merrill writes: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM Richard Sandiford > wrote: > >> Jakub Jelinek writes: >> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via >> Gcc-patches wrote: >> >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using >> >> keywords, rather

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Hello, On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote: > >> There are some existing attributes that similarly affect semantics > >> in ways that cannot be ignored. vector_size is one obvious example. > >> But that doesn't make it a good thing. :) > >... > > If you had added

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM Richard Sandiford wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via > Gcc-patches wrote: > >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using > >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:21 AM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Richard Biener writes: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > >> > >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using > >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Richard Biener writes: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] >> syntax. Would that be OK? >> >> In more detail: >> >>

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using > keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] > syntax. Would that be OK? > > In more detail: > > We'd like to add some new

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] >> syntax. Would that be OK? > > Will defer to C/C++

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Thanks for the feedback. Nathan Sidwell writes: > On 7/14/23 11:56, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] >> syntax. Would that be OK? >> >> In more detail: >> >> We'd like

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On 7/14/23 11:56, Richard Sandiford wrote: Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] syntax. Would that be OK? In more detail: We'd like to add some new target-specific attributes for Arm SME. These attributes

Re: [WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote: > Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using > keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] > syntax. Would that be OK? Will defer to C/C++ maintainers, but as you mentioned,

[WIP RFC] Add support for keyword-based attributes

Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]] syntax. Would that be OK? In more detail: We'd like to add some new target-specific attributes for Arm SME. These attributes affect semantics and code generation and so