Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.

-- >8 --

For targets without std::strtof we can define std::stof by calling
std::stod and then checking if the result is out of range of float.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        PR libstdc++/110653
        * include/bits/basic_string.h [!_GLIBCXX_HAVE_STRTOF] (stof):
        Define in terms of std::stod.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h 
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
index 32f5d4421f7..e4cb9846025 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
@@ -4153,6 +4153,22 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CXX11
   inline float
   stof(const string& __str, size_t* __idx = 0)
   { return __gnu_cxx::__stoa(&std::strtof, "stof", __str.c_str(), __idx); }
+#else
+  inline float
+  stof(const string& __str, size_t* __idx = 0)
+  {
+    double __d = std::stod(__str, __idx);
+    if (__builtin_isfinite(__d))
+      {
+       double __abs_d = __builtin_fabs(__d);
+       if (__abs_d < __FLT_MIN__ || __abs_d > __FLT_MAX__)
+         {
+           errno = ERANGE;
+           std::__throw_out_of_range("stof");
+         }
+      }
+    return __d;
+  }
 #endif
 
 #if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB || _GLIBCXX_HAVE_STRTOLD
-- 
2.41.0

Reply via email to